Selected Articles from the
April 1999 Odyssey
Editor: Norm Cook
NOTE: OASIS Secretary Bob Gounley is an engineer working
on the Deep Space 1 project.
Space 1 mission has successfully demonstrated most of its exotic
technologies in space--including an ion engine that is expected to be
ten times more efficient than conventional liquid or solid rocket engines--proving
they are ready for use in science missions of the 21st century.
Of the 12 advanced technologies onboard the spacecraft, seven have completed
testing, including the ion propulsion system, solar array, and new technologies
in communications, microelectronics, and spacecraft structures.
"We've taken these technologies around the test track, and now they're
ready for the production line," said Dr. Marc Rayman, deputy mission manager
and chief mission engineer for Deep Space 1 at NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, CA.
Launched October 24, Deep Space 1 is the first mission under
NASA's New Millennium Program, which features flight testing
of new technology, rather than science, as its main focus. These new technologies
will make spacecraft of the future smaller, cheaper, more reliable, and
more independent of human control.
By summer, engineers expect to have finished testing all 12 advanced
technologies aboard the spacecraft.
Testing of two technologies that make the Deep Space 1 less
reliant on humans is 75 percent complete, while testing of a third is
scheduled to begin in May. These technologies include a robotic navigator,
called AutoNav, that will guide the spacecraft to a rendezvous
with asteroid 1992 KD on July 29 without active human control from the
In addition, Deep Space 1's two advanced science instruments--a
combination camera/spectrometer and an instrument that studies electrically
charged particles emitted by the Sun and other sources-- are on schedule,
having finished 75 percent of their tests.
"What has pleased us more than anything is how well the technologies
have been working in general," Rayman said, noting that their performance
is remarkably close to engineers' estimates developed before launch.
"Of course, everything hasn't worked perfectly on the first try," Rayman
added. "If it had, it would mean that we had not been sufficiently aggressive
in selecting the technologies. Diagnosing the behavior of the various
technologies is a fundamental part of Deep Space 1's objective of enabling
future space science missions."
When the ion propulsion system was first activated November 10, the
engine shut itself off after 4-1/2 minutes, and engineers were unable
to restart it later that day. During the next attempt two weeks later,
however, the engine started up easily and has performed flawlessly since
then, logging more than 1,300 hours of operation.
Engineers believe the problem was caused by a piece of grit stuck to
high-voltage grids within the ion engine. The grit was later dislodged,
they believe, when parts expanded and contracted as the ion engine was
exposed alternately to sunlight and shade.
Engineers also discovered after launch that stray light enters the camera/spectrometer,
resulting in streaks of light when pictures are taken with a long exposure.
The streaks are a result of how the instrument was mounted on the spacecraft,
The camera should be able to take acceptable pictures when Deep
Space 1 flies by asteroid 1992 KD this summer, because it will use
Despite such glitches, the great majority of the advanced technologies
have worked extremely well, according to Rayman. "Mission designers and
scientists can now confidently use them on future missions," he said.
Deep Space 1 will continue testing technologies until its prime
mission concludes on September 18. NASA is considering a possible extended
mission that would take the spacecraft on flybys of two comets in 2001.
The Deep Space 1 mission is managed for NASA's Office of Space
Science, Washington, DC, by JPL, a division of the California Institute
of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Spectrum Astro Inc., Gilbert, AZ, was JPL's
primary industrial partner in spacecraft development.
Top of Page
The field of black holes, formerly dominated by heavyweights packing
the gravitational punch of a billion Suns and lightweights just a few
times heavier than our Sun, now has a new contender--a just-discovered
mysterious class of "middleweight" black holes.
Astronomers at NASA and Carnegie Mellon University have independently
found evidence for the new type of black holes in spiral-shaped galaxies
throughout the Universe. The newfound black holes, formed by an unknown
process, are 100 to 10,000 times as massive as the Sun, yet each occupies
less space than the Moon.
Until now, scientists knew about two types of black holes: stellar and
supermassive. Stellar black holes are the remains of dead stars several
times heavier than the Sun, compressed to a diameter of a few miles or
less. Supermassive black holes have mind-boggling masses of one million
to one billion Suns and may have formed in the early universe from giant
gas clouds or from the collapse of clusters of immense numbers of stars.
The astronomers identified the new class of black holes through X-ray
light, the final cries of energy emitted from gas and particles spiraling
into a black hole.
Dr. Edward Colbert and Dr. Richard Mushotzky, astronomers at NASA's
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, first saw hints of the new
class of black holes while studying X-rays from 39 relatively nearby galaxies.
Dr. Andrew Ptak and Dr. Richard Griffiths at Carnegie Mellon University
studied X-ray light from a galaxy not included in Colbert and Mushotzky's
set, galaxy M82. Both teams found unique X- ray light indicative of a
new black hole class.
"Our intent was to understand what was producing an unusual class of
X-ray luminosities near the centers of many galaxies," said Colbert. "With
data from the 1970s, we couldn't determine whether they had features associated
with supermassive black holes or stellar black holes. So we took a fresh
look with newer data."
Colbert and Mushotzky found telltale clues for a new type of black hole
in the spectrum of the X-ray light. Such colors are judged by comparing
the intensity of X-rays with shorter wavelengths to those with longer
Supermassive black holes are thought to power a phenomenon called Active
Galactic Nuclei, which are extremely compact and energetic objects seen
in the core of one percent of all galaxies and are typically very bright
X-ray sources. The luminosities that Colbert and Mushotzky analyzed have
colors different from those found in Active Galactic Nuclei, suggesting
the source is something other than a typical supermassive black hole.
Ptak and Griffiths acted on the belief among astronomers that black
holes of various sizes must exist and likely reside in "irregular" galaxies
(galaxies not spiral or elliptical in shape). M82 is one such galaxy,
called a starburst galaxy because of the high rate of star formation found
inside. Such a scenario leads to a higher rate of supernovae, or star
explosions, the precursor of stellar black holes.
"Millions of black holes and neutron stars have formed in M82 over the
last 10 million years," Ptak said. "Now, we are noticing that some of
these may be coalescing into a larger-mass black hole." Ptak said this
is the most viable current theory for intermediate black hole formation.
Colbert also said the intermediate class suggested by his and Mushotzky's
observations might be formed by "the continual merging of stellar black
holes." In other words, stellar black holes that approach each other too
closely under certain circumstances can merge to form a more massive single
Top of Page
Copyright © 1998-2003 Organization for the Advancement of Space Industrialization and Settlement. All Rights Reserved.